Historical timeline of American Indian policies

A historical timeline of documents
This area provides an overview of important events and documents in the history of Native – non-Native relations. It is ordered chronologically, by different time periods, and contains links to the documents. Presenting a history through documents lets the readers come to their own conclusions. It also puts the responsibility to interpret and analyze on the reader.
This is not a full selection. The documents are selected to be examples and exhibits of larger dynamics. We are continuously in the process of updating the timeline.
-
1400 – 1763
This time period is marked by initial encounters and the establishment of relations. Spanish efforts are aimed at conquest, ending the sovereignty of indigenous nations. The French explore vast areas of the mid-continent, establish settlements along the Saint Lawrence river valley and the Gulf coast, and send missionaries and traders to live with Native nations. The English found colonies along the east coast and around Hudson’s Bay. Dutch, Scottish, Swedish, Basque, Portuguese, and other people establish communities in various places in North America.
The Indian Provisions of the Royal Proclamation of 1763 establish the model for British and American relations with Native nations.
-
1763 – 1803
This period shows the context of sovereign Native nations essential to the founding and establishment of the United States. It ends with the purchase of the French claim to Louisiana territory (including present day Iowa).
Several foundational policies for relations with Native nations are established in this period. Of particular interest might be the Trade and Intercourse Acts, the Northwest Ordinance, and the documents surrounding the Louisiana purchase. These establish Jefferson’s idea to use economics as a force to “civilize” Native nations and make them sell their lands.
- 1777 Articles of Confederation
- 1778 Treaty with the Delaware
- 1783 Treaty of Paris
- 1785 Land Ordinance
- 1786 Treaty with the Choctaw
- 1786 Regulation of Indian Affairs
- 1787 Northwest Ordinance
- 1789 Constitution of the United States
- 1790 Trade and Intercourse Act
- 1790 Treaty with the Creek
- 1792 Agreement with the Five Nations
- 1793 Trade and Intercourse Act
- 1796 Trade and Intercourse Act
- 1800 Retrocession of Louisiana Territory to France
- 1800 Act for the Preservation of Peace with the Indian Tribes
- 1803 Jefferson’s Secret Message to Congress
- 1803 Act to Enable Possession of Louisiana Territory
- 1803 Treaty for the Purchase of Louisiana Territory
-
1803 – 1860
After the purchase of the French claim to Louisiana Territory, the United States turned its focus to Native sovereignty and land rights. This happened within two contexts: efforts to remove Native nations to an Indian Territory to make space for an orderly settlement by Americans, and the idea of Manifest Destiny that saw the United States as divinely ordained to possess and settle North America.
Of foundational importance here are the cases of the Marshall Trilogy. Johnson v. McIntosh establishes the right of cultivators to take the land of hunters and gatherers (the Doctrine of Discovery) – ignoring the fact that native nations were agricultural. Cherokee v. Georgia and Worcester v. Georgia establish the extent and unilateral limitation of Native sovereignty as “domestic dependent nations.”
- 1804 Treaty with the Sac and Fox
- 1807 Act to Prevent Premature Settlement on Ceded Lands
- 1815 Treaty with Sioux of the Lakes
- 1823 Johnson v. McIntosh
- 1825 Treaty of Prairie des Chiens
- 1825 Treaty with the Arikara
- 1827 Constitution of the Cherokee Nation
- 1828 Communications about the Cherokee Constitution
- 1828 Treaty with Cherokee West of the Mississippi
- 1828 Cherokee Phoenix on the Treaty with the Cherokee West of the Mississippi
- 1828 Choctaw on Removal
- 1830 Jackson on Removal
- 1830 Cherokee Phoenix on Jackson
- 1830 A Letter on Removal in Indiana
- 1830 City of Hartford against Removal
- 1830 Citizens of Massachusetts against Removal
- 1830 Indian Removal Act
- 1830 Treaty with the Sauk and Foxes, etc.
- 1831 Cherokee v. Gerogia
- 1832 Worcester v. Georgia
- 1832 Treaty with the Sauk and Foxes
- 1835 Jackson on Removal
- 1839 John O’Sullivan The Great Nation of Futurity
- 1842 Treaty with the Sauk and Foxes
- 1845 John O’Sullivan Annexation
- 1848 Treaty of Guadelupe Hidalgo
- 1851 Treaty of Fort Laramie
- 1851 Treaty with the Sioux – Mdewakanton and Wahpekute
- 1854 Treaty with the Chippewa
- 1855 Treaty with the Makah
- 1858 Treaty with the Sisseton and Wahpeton
-
1860 – 1890
Between the Civil War and 1890, the United States made the last treaties with Native nations and then began the policy of forced assimilation. Settlement of the plains was prepared by three interconnected acts: the Morril Act, the Homestead Act, and the Transcontinental Railroad Act. Treaty making ended in 1871. Congress then began a process of regulation through its assumed position as a guardian over Native nations.
The regulation of land ownership (through allotment) and jurisdiction (through the Major Crimes Act) still have far reaching consequences today.
- 1862 Homestead Act
- 1862 Morrill Act
- 1862 Pacific Railway Act
- 1863 Act of Feb. 17 (Removal of Dakota from Minnesota)
- 1867 Treaty with the Kiowa, Apache, and Comanche
- 1867 Treaty with the Kiowa and Comanche (Medicine Lodge Treaty)
- 1867 Report on the Conditions of the Indian Tribes
- 1868 Treaty with the Sioux and Arapaho (Treaty of Fort Laramie)
- 1868 Treaty with the Northern Cheyenne and Northern Arapaho
- 1876 U.S. v. Joseph
- 1877 Act of 1877 (Manypenny Agreement)
- 1882 An Act to Survey and Sell Omaha Lands
- 1884 Establishment of Turtle Mountain Reservation
- 1885 Major Crimes Act
- 1887 General Allotment Act (Dawes Act)
- 1888 The Legal Status of Indians
- 1888 Teaching the Bible in Indian Languages
- 1888 Act in Relation to Marriage between White Men and Indian Women
- 1889 Division of the Great Sioux Reservation
- 1890 Proclamation of Sioux Reservations
-
1890 – 1933
In this time span, the federal government is further refining previous policies of assimilation. The supreme court is also refining and revising some of its decisions, and Native nations begin to demand their rights – for example water rights in Winters v. US. The Snyder Act and the Indian Citizenship Act lead into a new era.
- 1891 Proclamation on the Fort Berthold Reservation
- 1897 An Act to Prohibit the Sale of Intoxicating Drinks to Indians
- 1902 Reclamation Act
- 1903 Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock
- 1906 Burke Act
- 1908 Winters v. U.S.
- 1913 U.S. v. Sandoval
- 1915 Disposal of Lands on Fort Berthold
- 1915 Disposal of Lands on Standing Rock
- 1921 Snyder Act
- 1924 Indian Citizenship Act
-
1933 – 1950
During the New Deal, federal policy shifted in its relationships with Native nations. Under John Collier, the Bureau of Indian Affairs adopted policies of the Indian New Deal, starting with the Indian Reorganization Act. However, during the second world war and after, the opposition to the new policies grew, and the beginning of a policy of termination of sovereignty began.
- 1934 Indian Reorganization Act (Wheeler Howard Act)
- 1934 The Powers of Indian Tribes
- 1936 Revocation of the Opening of Unallotted Lands and Mineral Rights
- 1936 Order of Restoration, Standing Rock
- 1938 Act to Regulate the Leasing of Indian Mineral Rights
- 1938 Proclamation of Upper Sioux Indian Community
- 1942 Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United States
- 1946 Act to Create the Indian Claims Commission
- 1946 Act to Confer Jurisdiction over Devils Lake to North Dakota
-
1950 – 1970
Between 1950 and 1970, the United States followed a policy of termination in its relations with Native nations. It aimed at terminating the special legal status of sovereign Native nations. These policies also led to American Indians reaffirming their rights under treaties and Native sovereignty. In the 1960s, a growing movement began to resist federal policies.
-
1970 -1990
After the termination ended in disaster for the nations who had been terminated, and under pressure from social movements, the federal government adjusted its policies. The new focus was now self-determination. The 1970s saw a slew of acts that enhanced tribal self government. However, this time span ended with the supreme court decision in Lyng, which gravely restricted the progress that had been achieved in recognizing tribal rights.
- 1970 Nixon Message on Self Determination
- 1972 Position Paper Trail of Broken Treaties
- 1974 Boldt Decision
- 1975 Indian Self-Determination and Educational Assistance Act
- 1976 Indian Health Care Improvement Act
- 1979 Hearing on Police Brutality on Reservations
- 1980 United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians
- 1986 Hearing on Sioux Nation Black Hills Act
- 1989 Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association
-
1990-2010
After Lyng and the passing of the Native American Graces Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), policies and court decisions paint a rather diverse picture of federal relations to Native nations.
This period is dominated in many ways by the lawsuits surrounding trust fund mismanagement (especially Cobell). The largest class-action lawsuit in American history, it is settled in 2010.
- 1990 NAGPRA as amended
- 1999 Minnesota v. Mille Lacs
- 2003 GAO Report on the Effect of Climate Change on Alaska Native Villages
- 2004 Bonnichsen v. United States
- 2005 Cherokee v. Delaware
- 2005 City of Sherrill v. Oneida Nation
- 2005 Cobell v. Norton Memorandum OIpinion
- 2005 Senate Joint Resolution 15
- 2005 Lewis v. Norton
- 2006 South Dakota Equal Justice Committee Final Report
- 2006 U.S. Senate Hearing on Tribal Self-Governance
- 2007 Maze of Injustice Report
- 2007 Report on Public Law 280 and Sexual Assault on Native Women
- 2007 American Indians and Alaska Natives: 2004
- 2007 Report on Urban Indian Health
- 2008 Cobell v. Kempthorne Findings of Fact
- 2008 GAO Report on Indian Health Service Mismanagement
- 2008 MoA between Cherokee Nation and Delaware Tribe
- 2008 Urban Indian America
- 2009 Carcieri v. Salazar
- 2009 Shattered Hearts Report
- 2009 Presidential Memorandum on Tribal Consultation
- 2009 Cobell Settlement Agreement
- 2009 Elouise Cobell Testimony
-
2010 –
Far from defining a new era of policy, different United States administrations have been changing federal policies in significant ways. These shifts mark a time of uncertainty for sovereign Native nations.
In 2010, the United States recognizes the UN Declaration on Indigenous Rights as a moral guideline. This is put to the test in several instances over tribal consultation and Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) rights.
- 2010 U.S. Support for UNDRIP
- 2010 U.S. Ambassador to the UN Rice on UNDRIP
- 2010 GAO Report on NAGPRA Compliance
- 2010 Declination Rates of Indian Country Criminal Matters
- 2011 Garden of Truth Report
- 2011 State of Washington v. Eriksen
- 2012 Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter
- 2012 Arctic Slope Native Association v. Sebelius
- 2012 Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
- 2014 Reaffirmation of Federal Trust Responsibilities
- 2014 Report on Violence against Native Children
- 2014 UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues Statement on UNDRIP
- 2015 Hopi v. US
- 2016 Report on Violence against Native Men and Women
- 2016 Letter by Department of the Interior on DAPL
- 2016 American Council on Historic Preservation Objection to DAPL
- 2016 Declaration on Sacred Sites and DAPL
- 2016 Response by DAPL
- 2016 International Indian Treaty Council Resolution on DAPL
- 2016 Statement by Chief Edward John on DAPL
- 2016 Statement by UN PFII on DAPL
- 2016 CRST Chairman Harold Frazier on Treaty Lands and DAPL
- 2019 Executive Order on Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women
- 2020 Minnesota Report on Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women
- 2020 McGirt v. Oklahoma
- 2020 Oklahoma v. Sizemore (Choctaw Nation)
- 2020 Gov. Noem to Bernhardt on CoVID Road Closures
- 2020 Gov. Noem to CRST Chairman Frazier on Road Closures
- 2020 Frazier to Noem on Road Closures
- 2020 BIA Memo on Road Closures
- 2020 CRST v. Trump Complaint
- 2020 NCAI on CARES Act and Tribal Governments
- 2021 U.S. v. Cooley
- 2021 GAO Report on Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women
- 2021 Declaring a Derogatory Name
- 2021 Memorandum on Tribal Consultation
- 2021 Oklahoma v. Lawhorn (Quapaw Nation)
- 2021 Rosebud v. U.S.
- 2021 American Council on Historic Preservation on Resolution Copper Mine
- 2021 Council Bluffs v. Department of the Interior
- 2022 Haaland v. Brackeen
- 2022 Manoomin v. DNR
- 2023 Sacred Sites Best Practices Guide
- 2023 Arizona v. Navajo
- 2024 Jurisdiction and Native Allotments in Alaska
- 2024 Apache Stronghold v. U.S.
- 2024 National Park Service Tribal Consultation Order